ࡱ> (*'7 0bjbjUU )7|7|l>>>> J jjjjjjjj$  jjjjj"jj"""j^jj"j"j"j^ @ MH>Z0  " "THE UN ROLE IN THE PERSIAN GULF CRISIS- 1990-91 WHY UN ACTED? UN ROLE? LESSONS/PRECEDENTS? REALIST: Threatened balance of Provided legitimacy to UN had little or no independent influence on the power, regional status quo, largest deployment of decision-making of states; U.S. manipulation of UN; INTERESTS of permanent military action since Po$itive inducements required to persuade other Security Council members WW II; enabled US to states to support collective security action: U.S. escape condemnation forgiveness of Egyptian loans; Patriot missiles to for excessive civilian Israel; promise of military hardware to Saudi casualties and damage Arabia; while Yemen punished for abstention with to infrastructure cut-off of US aid. LIBERAL: Uphold rule of law; Provided framework International cooperation possible when there is NORMS for collective action by commonly held belief in the rule of law; interdependence states; served pragmatic made states willing to fund IOs and their actions after interests of governments; hegemonyfinancial contributions of Germany and facilitated cooperation; Japan helped make collective action possible. showed advantages of multilateralism MARXIST: Legacy of imperialism; Benefitted US military- UN collective security used to liberate an anti- influence of global industrial complex, democratic, oil-rich kingdom with strong ties to capitalism multinational oil the capitalist west from an anti-West despot; UN companies, rich (and action carried out by US military force, funded by oil-rich) countries who Kuwait and Saudi Arabia (Germany and Japan can afford to buy paid for 1/3; Kuwait and Saudi Arabia 2/3); made protection world safe for monarchy, not democracy; SC 688 allow for UN humanitarian intervention to override sovereignty of developing states for perceived human rights abuses. FEMINIST: Male decision-makers- Women, children UN priorities are masculinee.g. more likely to use victimized by sanctions military force, sovereignty, territory; coercion and force to (UNSC 662 embargo), Gulf crisis remasculated U.S. military achieve control, then by missile strikes, and foreign policy after Vietnam. dominance bombs, damage to infrastructure and homes  5\_H o(5\03%LP (  o B [  $A$^a$$a$mY|}\[ '&P1h0= /!`"`#$% i8@8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH <A@< Default Paragraph Font8&@8 Footnote ReferenceH* 03%LP(oB[  m  Y | } \ [00000000000000000000000000000000000000   BG  "'DEjm6?Z`W` > A , 6 $ / h n t | s|3333333333333333333333333333Marsha B. CohenMC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of Document1.asdMarsha B. CohenCC:\My Documents\INR 3502\THE UN ROLE IN THE PERSIAN GULF CRISIS.doc@HHdHG@UnknownG:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial"qhfsfrfg,b !`2042Q/THE UN ROLE IN THE PERSIAN GULF CRISIS- 1990-91Marsha B. CohenMarsha B. CohenZOh+'0$ <H d p | 0THE UN ROLE IN THE PERSIAN GULF CRISIS- 1990-91HE Marsha B. CohenarsarsNormalBMarsha B. Cohen1rsMicrosoft Word 9.0P@*c@@O@"2,b Z՜.+,04 hp  University of Central FloridaP4 0THE UN ROLE IN THE PERSIAN GULF CRISIS- 1990-91 Title  !"#$%&)Root Entry F@ M+1TableWordDocument)SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjjObjectPool@ M@ M  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q